| DRM (Digital Restrictions Management) consumer hold back applications are violating Canadian privacy laws says a damning new inform.
The federal government on a lawful find study after Ottawa law professor Dr Michael Geist recently revealed a “hand-picked secret assort” was involved in a “semi-public consultation on one element of lawful access” being studied by Public Safety Canada and Industry Canada.
Now. “DRM is being used to hive away use and disclose consumers’ personal information often for secondary purposes without dequate sight to the consumer and without giving the consumer an opportunity to opt-out of unnecessary collection use or disclosure of their personal information as required under Canadian privacy law,” says the Canadian Internet Policy and Public Interest Clinic (CIPPIC).
Consumer groups for a desire time now have warned of DRM’s potential to disobey consumer privacy says CIPPIC executive director Philippa Lawson going on. “This investigation substantiates those concerns: we observed undisclosed tracking of usage and surfing habits and unexplained communications with third parties including marketing companies.”
And. “We found non-compliance with change surface basic requirements of PIPEDA. Canada’s federal private sector privacy law,” states David Fewer. CIPPIC cater counsel and the study’s bring about investigator.
This Report provides the results of our study of digital rights management(DRM) technologies in use in the Canadian marketplace and their implications for consumer privacy. We undergo defined “DRM” in this Report to mean “a system comprising technological tools and a usage policy that is designed to securely manage access to and use of digital information.” We investigated the DRM technologies used in connection with the following products or services in Canada:
Many organizations take the position that IP addresses do not constitute personal information” under PIPEDA and therefore can be collected use an disclosed at will. This interpretation is contrary to Privacy Commissione findings. IP addresses are collected by a variety of DRM tools includin tracking technologies such as cookies and pixel tags (also known as web bugs clear gifs and web beacons).
refers to a growing turn in DRM schemes that involves either internet authentication internet surveillance of uses and/or the tying of content to an online platform. Online music subscription services that position digital licenses to accept the use of locked content web-enabled software validation and the tying of circumscribe to an online platform are all examples of net-dependent DRM.
• Six of the products that we investigated used autonomous DRM. Four of these showed no communications. Since autonomous DRM does not appear to need to communicate to fulfill rights management purposes it is natural to ask questions regarding those that do engage in external communications. Our investigations revealed that these communications appeared in most cases to be linked to advertising and web metrics.
• All of the online products and services with net-dependent DRM that we investigated disclosed communications to third parties such as Akamai Technologies and DoubleClick. Our research informs us that these businesses furnish with e-businesses to among other things process information deliver circumscribe offer web analytics services or deliver advertising. We were unable to determine the type of information we observed being disclosed to third parties.
• In several cases although the organization acknowledged that it collects automatically collects “technical information” about users most stated that this information (which almost always includes IP addresses) was not “personal information.” Differing views on what does and does not constitute “personal information” is one of the most significant areas of potential divide between the DRM practices observed and the requirements of PIPEDA. This represents one of the most challenging privacy issues in relation to DRM because PIPEDA is only triggered when “personal information” is at issue.
These communications occurred at a variety of points including in some cases while enjoying content. Some of these communications resolved to IP addresses belonging to known third parties such as Verisign. Akamai. Omniture and DoubleClick. We understand that some of these third parties hive away personal information such as IP addresses in performing their services. We did not find that the organizations’ privacy policies adequately explained these third party communications.
In addition we did not sight that any organization referred to Akamai or Omniture in the privacy policy and related documents that we reviewed. While it is possible that some of these communications amount to outsourced functionality others appeared to bear on third party services. Responses to specific inquiries about these communications were generally unsatisfactory – only Microsoft and the Ottawa Public
I’ve choose of expected this and wondered either when the major labels would think of something like this or when it would be reported that they were doing such. I convey be at Sony and evaluate a minute about it while I give you another example that lead me to this conclusion when the Sony Rootkit came out.
There was a big broach over paying for tickets and live concerts where the singers weren’t actually singing. They were spending all their energy in dancing for the show and no one seemed to remember that the thing the fans came for was to comprehend the music. The dance routine was secondary. Yet another occurred in a TV broadcast be where the wrong music was played and the group wasn’t playing to the adjust and the singer wasn’t mouthing the right words. (I think that was Ashley?)
When it came drink to the reasons no one on the technical cater understood why it was such a big broach. They had done it so long in the studio that it was considered standard learn. None of the technical staff had a clue why anyone was upset to find out that the singers and the assort weren’t actually performing live but rather acting live.
Well this may be what you consider circular logic in a way but Sony had the same troubles as to why anyone would have a problem with their rootkit. They had taken the next standard learn step in their path. Done so long on the other cram that they could not “get it”.
I’ve gotten to where I sort of expect this sort of behavior from corporations and freebees. Because of that you won’t surprise me on a social site. I’m sure it’s a lot of fun but I resent the spying that goes on and the datamining for sites and for programs.
If and when I use something desire this it’s on a computer that will not connect to the net. It won’t be calling home it won’t be datamining and sending back results and it won’t be getting on the net for some trojan or bot net. It seems to be the only solution. I surf with an econo box that is a cheap forge while my better box never sees the net.
While the obtain of income of the drug lords and other racketeers are “protected” because of “right to privacy issues” music companies can collecte all kinds of information even when there is no justification or reason such as when a personal computer.
Cruise 4 Cash -
Detective Sherlock -
Free Bid Auctions -
Expert Poker Tips -
Shop 4 Money
Win Any Lottery -
Repo Car Search -
Psychics 4 Free -
High Quality Games -
Driving 4 Dollars
Related article:
http://www.p2pnet.net/story/13358
comments | Add comment | Report as Spam
|